In the months leading up before the multi-million dollar fraud, Caritas was already being targeted by scammers. Why did the Chief Financial Officer still make 125 transfers to Spain between February and July 2024? And who did the Spanish accounts actually belong to?
Listen to Episode 8 with English subtitles in the video below, or read the full transcript.
Léonardo Kahn Thursday, 11 May 2023, a member of Caritas’ finance department receives an e-mail from marc.crochet@gmx.de.
MCgmx Hello, hope you are doing well today? I will need you to sort out some payments for me today. Kindly email me when you are ready to process the payments, so I can email you the payment details.
Regards,
Marc Crochet
Léonardo Kahn Nine months later, Caritas’ CFO receives a very similar message. You might remember that e-mail, we mentioned it back at the very start of this series, in Episode 1. The one with someone pretending to be the CEO of Caritas. The infamous e-mail that triggered a multi-million-euro fraud.
The thing is, this wasn’t the first time Caritas had been targeted by this type of fraud. And yet, the CFO says that she was subsequently conned by a fake Marc Crochet. How is that possible?
We tackle this and other unresolved questions in our eighth and final episode of “The Caritas Affair”.
Charel Weiler When disaster strikes, everything that can go wrong, does.
Djuna Bernard So many worst-case scenarios piling on top of one another.
Tom Weidig I think the podcast was a vital source of information.
Taina Bofferding There you sometimes find out more than we did on the special committee.
Léonardo Kahn My name is Léonardo Kahn and this is Scene Change, the 100.7 documentary podcast. An investigation by Pia Oppel and Jean-Claude Franck.
Episode 8: Not Just One Fraud.
So far in our telling of the Caritas affair, we have moved forward in time with each episode, starting in February 2024 when the multi-million-euro fraud began, all the way to last autumn when Caritas had all but ceased to exist.
Today, we’re doing the opposite and going back in time a bit. Back to the year before Caritas was defrauded of €61 million. Pia, Jean-Claude, what does the year 2023 tell us about the story we’re looking at in this podcast?
Pia Oppel It tells us that Caritas had in fact developed a sort of procedure for dealing with attempted fraud. We were told by multiple sources at Caritas that it happened fairly regularly, that it was a pretty everyday occurrence. This wasn’t previously public knowledge. And this sheds new light on the entire affair.
Jean-Claude Franck There are some exciting examples that we’ve seen documentation on. Including two cases where Caritas did in fact fall for messages just like this. All of which Caritas also discussed internally.
Léonardo Kahn What happened exactly?
Jean-Claude Franck Well, for one case we have to go back to January 2023. I.e. a good twelve months before the enormous scandal we now know all about began.
Pia Oppel In January it was a similar set-up to what we’ve already seen. Someone pretending to be Marc Crochet. The only request on this occasion is that his salary be paid into a different account.
Jean-Claude Franck That request was sent from xox1066@talktalk.net. But no-one noticed and Caritas did in fact wire Marc Crochet’s pay to this other account. The bank, however, did notice that something wasn’t right and stopped the transfer.
Pia Oppel It was the Chief Human Resources Officer who fell for this particular scam. But the entire management team, which the CFO is also a member of, gets wind of what’s happened and it prompts a discussion.
Léonardo Kahn You mentioned two incidents from 2023 where Caritas fell for a fraud, what was the second one?
Pia Oppel The second one happens just two months later, in March 2023. That one involved someone pretending to be a Caritas partner in Bangladesh. They used forged documents to ask for money for a project to be sent to a different account.
Jean-Claude Franck That account was held with a bank in Mexico. And the forgeries were not particularly convincing when you took a closer look at them. And yet, Caritas wires around €130,000 to the account.
Léonardo Kahn That’s a pretty big sum of money.
Pia Oppel Absolutely! But there’s a happy ending this time, too. Caritas notices that something is wrong because their partner in Bangladesh chases them, asking where their money is. And they actually manage to recall the transfer.
Jean-Claude Franck The only cost Caritas incurs are the fees the bank charges for recouping the money. So the damage is contained, as a member of the finance team tells the CFO. In an e-mail entitled “Urgent: Fraud”, no less.
Hello everyone, the fees retained amount to € 97 (€ 7 BCEE + € 90 Mexican Bank).
Pia Oppel This time round, the management committee does more than just discuss the incident. Now an e-mail is also sent out to all Caritas staff, warning them against fraud involving people pretending to be someone else, on the phone or via e-mail.
This type of attack is becoming increasingly sophisticated and can, among other things, use emails or phone calls to obtain information or even money tramsfers.
Jean-Claude Franck The instruction to staff is clear.
Any email of unknown or suspicious origin should be forwarded immediately to support.informatique@caritas.lu.
Pia Oppel And in fact just a few weeks later, in May 2023, the finance employee we heard from at the beginning of the episode reacts exactly as instructed.
Jean-Claude Franck That was the e-mail we started the episode with, which was sent from marc.crochet@gmx.de.
Hello, hope you are doing well today? I will need you to sort out some payments for me today...
Pia Oppel Again, someone is pretending to be Caritas CEO Marc Crochet. The employee, who does in fact speak English at work, is asked to transfer around €80,000 to a Turkish bank.
Jean-Claude Franck But he realises what’s going on and notifies IT. He also lets the CFO and the real Marc Crochet know that a criminal is once again pretending to be the CEO of Caritas.
Pia Oppel And the real Marc Crochet reacts with a warning of his own.
Marc Crochet This is a problem that can, and will repeat itself. This is not mere spam. This is a personalised and targeted criminal approach. That means you all need to be extremely cautious when finance related communication comes from ‘me’.
Jean-Claude Franck He puts ‘me’ in inverted commas to indicate that if someone claiming to be Marc Crochet asks for money, then please everyone proceed with extreme caution and clear it with me directly.
Pia Oppel That e-mail goes to a long list of executives at Caritas, including the CFO. Again, the instructions are crystal clear.
Marc Crochet Best is to give me a call in order to cross-check, and to do that with anyone in a position to issue such orders, whenever something is ‘out of the ordinary’.
Pia Oppel The e-mail also ends by praising the employee who spotted and reported the attempted fraud.
Marc Crochet You did well!
Léonardo Kahn And as we know, the CFO receives her own e-mail from a fake Marc Crochet in February 2024, so nine months after this. Nothing new in itself, right?
Jean-Claude Franck Exactly, because the e-mail she gets on 7 February 2024 came from marc.crochet55@gmail.com, i.e. not from his work e-mail, not to mention it specifically talks about money.
MC55 Hello, I am currently handling an important transaction, this project must remain strictly confidential…
Pia Oppel And yet, the CFO will go on to claim that she fell for this. After all those months of discussions about this specific type of fraud.
Léonardo Kahn She has so far declined to comment on everything you’ve uncovered during your investigation – is that still the case?
Jean-Claude Franck Yes, we recently reached out to her lawyer again, asking if it would be possible for us to get more answers to our questions.
Pia Oppel Yes, hello, this is Pia Oppel from radio 100.7. I’m trying to reach Maître Reuter. Is he available?
Pia Oppel But the response was the same, neither the lawyer nor his client are willing to comment. Which isn’t all that surprising given a criminal investigation is ongoing.
Jean-Claude Franck The CFO was indicted last July on account of the role she played in the fraudulent transfers to Spain. Her lawyer’s general position is that she wasn’t behind the fraud, nor did she benefit from it.
Pia Oppel One of the many questions we sent the CFO via her lawyer was why she breached the internal company rules she had personally helped draft when making the fraudulent transfers.
Léonardo Kahn What rules were that exactly?
Pia Oppel They intended to protect Caritas against money-laundering risks. Such policies are mandatory for large NGOs, especially ones providing international aid.
Jean-Claude Franck Caritas, for example, didn’t generally accept anonymous donations, to prevent money from illegal sources ending up in its accounts. And vice versa, they had to verify exactly where funds were going ‘out in the field’.
Pia Oppel It was about preventing the organisation from sending money to a local partner who says they’re going to use the money to build a new school, say, only for that money to end up being used for illegal purposes – or even wind up in the hands of terrorist groups.
Léonardo Kahn Terrorist groups?
Pia Oppel Yes, in fact that’s exactly why the entire development aid sector is so tightly regulated. The government has also been pushing for this of late because Luxembourg has specific international obligations to combat money-laundering and the financing of terrorism.
Jean-Claude Franck And in recent years, Caritas has been having internal discussions over what exactly the charity’s policy should look like here. That’s according to the Director of the International Department, Michael Feit.
Michael Feit One easy example I can give you is that the CFO required us to obtain a certified copy of the ID of every person we were sending money to in South Sudan. That’s simply not possible in South Sudan.
Jean-Claude Franck During those discussions, the CFO had always pushed for having the strictest possible rules.
Michael Feit She would just say, no, she just wanted the rules she had set out.
Pia Oppel Again, this is something that throws up a few questions. Because the CFO’s behaviour between February and July 2024, as in, while the fraud is happening, is completely different. She even helped forge the invoices that were used for the majority of the fraudulent transfers.
Jean-Claude Franck Plus, she was told the money was for buying a company for a secret project. Meaning it wasn’t a secret that the payees on the 125 fraudulent transfers were incorrect – as in, the money wasn’t going to Caritas Internationalis or to Caritas’ Turkish partner organisation, ASAM.
Léonardo Kahn A quick recap: those are the payees that are indicated on the fraudulent transfers. As we mentioned in previous episodes, the money was wired to 14 accounts in Spain. What do we know, then, about who these accounts actually belonged to?
Pia Oppel Well, we have managed to find out something about those. The investigation took me somewhere quite unexpected.
Guy Grandgirard Come in, hello!
Pia Oppel Hello!
Pia Oppel Specifically, to a small consumer protection organisation in Nancy.
Guy Grandgirard So, a little introduction, Esteban is an intern, he’s studying law.
Pia Oppel At its core, the Consumer Defence Association of France is a small consumer protection association in Lorraine. Their modest offices are located on the first floor of a grey building not far from Nancy train station.
Guy Grandgirard And then Brian Petropavlovski, who is an employee of the association and who is a jurist.
Pia Oppel OK.
Pia Oppel I’m greeted by the president of the association. A retired civil servant who has been volunteering in consumer protection for decades.
Guy Grandgirard So I am Guy Grandgirard. I have been the president of the Association de défense des consommateurs de France for a number of years now.
Jean-Claude Franck In recent years, Guy Grandgirard has taken aim at one specific issue: online fraud which catches out private individuals, mostly because they believe they are investing in a profitable business.
Guy Grandgirard You have plenty of websites that are saying: ‘Look, we have a goof investment that will guarantee you a 24 percent net monthly return.’ That’s a lot, right?
Then at some point, they cut the ties.
Pia Oppel By then, the money is usually gone. Lots of victims are reaching out to Guy Grandgirard and his team right now, giving them the full details.
Guy Grandgirard And we’ll discover that a website is fraudulent. We’ll find the phone numbers, the names used. We’ll find the contracts, the business proposals, the IBANs.
Jean-Claude Franck As in, the accounts people have transferred their money to. Or which were sending them fake returns for at least a few months to keep them investing.
Guy Grandgirard And when we look at all that, we can do an online research and tell other consumers: don’t go to that website!
Pia Oppel What Guy Grandgirard does is connect the dots between all the cases victims bring him.
Guy Grandgirard It’s very simple. And everything is public.
Jean-Claude Franck Guy Grandgirard publishes his findings online. Detailing which a telephone numbers were used to commit fraud. Or what sort of account were opened in the name of what sort of company.
Pia Oppel And what you notice is that it’s rare for the accounts and the phone numbers these criminal networks use to appear just once.
Léonardo Kahn What does that mean exactly?
Pia Oppel Well, for example, we looked at one case of fraud where a couple believed they had invested nearly €55,000 in a student apartment.
Pia Oppel So this is the fraudulent contract.
Guy Grandgirard So you have a seemingly magnificent contract. And then there is an IBAN. So I take it and check if it’s already in my database. I add the new information I have. Like that I know that the account is used by two, three, four, five, six websites.
Pia Oppel Meaning that the same account numbers crop up in other cases of fraud, too. Like in this case, this specific account was used for a different scam where someone was asked to put his savings into a fake bank or to invest in parking spaces.
Jean-Claude Franck And you can draw connections from this enormous spider’s web that Guy Grandgirard has mapped out – thousands of account numbers, companies, frauds – to the Caritas affair.
Léonardo Kahn What sort of connections exactly?
Jean-Claude Franck So here, we need to jump in time again. To this news update from 24 January 2025.
Pierre Reyland Good evening, new developments in the Caritas affair. Eight individuals have been arrested as part of police raids carried out in Bulgaria, France and the UK.
Jean-Claude Franck As it happens, a ninth person was arrested one week after that. The prosecutor’s office confirmed to us that these nine individuals are now all in custody here in Luxembourg.
Pia Oppel We also reported this back in January.
Pierre Reyland According to information obtained by radio 100.7, these individuals were paid in order to set up bank accounts that were used fir the fraud.
Jean-Claude Franck To be more specific, these nine people set up companies in Spain in order to open bank accounts. And these accouns were used to commit fraud.
Léonardo Kahn But how did you find that out?
Pia Oppel Well, it wasn’t that tricky finding out the names of the companies. Because all the information is published in the Spanish business registry. We were able to use the name of one of the nine men, who are now in custody in Luxembourg, to directly identify several companies like this.
Jean-Claude Franck These companies were also created at exactly the same time as Caritas was being defrauded of €61 million.
Léonardo Kahn And where exactly is the link to the frauds documented by Guy Grandgirard?
Jean-Claude Franck So the companies we found in the Spanish business registry, they appear on the website of the ‘Association de défense des consommateurs de France’. And one of the Spanish accounts which Caritas transferred money to is listed there as well.
Pia Oppel The reason I went to Nancy was to make certain that it is indeed the case that victims of other frauds were dealing with exactly the same companies and account numbers as the ones that might have played a role in the Caritas affair.
Léonardo Kahn And what was your conclusion after your conversation with Guy Grandgirard?
Pia Oppel That the information on this organisation’s website is in fact based on concrete cases of fraud and that these cases are documented. Meaning that there are absolutely links between the fraud at Caritas and these other scams.
Léonardo Kahn But how do people even end up opening accounts that are then used by criminal networks?
Jean-Claude Franck Well it’s not particularly surprising that criminals who make their money through fraud prefer not to open the accounts they use for it in their own names. Otherwise they could get nicked by the police the second the fraud is spotted.
Pia Oppel Instead, they look for people who are willing to do it for them. A lot of fraud works according to a very similar blueprint.
Guy Grandgirard So officially they don’t know. Let’s keep it simple: they open an account but they don’t know what it’s for.
Jean-Claude Franck So, Guy Grandgirard says: generally speaking, these people don’t ask too many questions or aren’t given too much information on what exactly is happening with these accounts.
Guy Grandgirard In any case, the scammers tell them that they have nothing to fear. Because the scammers are convinced that they won’t be found anyway.
Pia Oppel It’s something Guy Grandgirard sees time and again, especially whenever a case winds up in court and the entire operation behind a fraud, or more accurately frauds, is dissected.
Guy Grandgirard There was a trial in Toulouse. And the mules were a French couple who needed money. They agreed to open 15 to 20 accounts and companies in Spain and Portugal.
Jean-Claude Franck “Money mules” is what people like this are called. The term “mules” comes from the drug trade where people are used to smuggle drugs, like pack animals.
Pia Oppel Here, it’s about opening accounts to get stolen money from A to B. In some cases, the money mules don’t even perform the transactions themselves, so essentially someone else is controlling the account.
Jean-Claude Franck Money mules are recruited through all sorts of means, often via social media, and they often get a small amount of compensation for the service.
Guy Grandgirard They are given money, they are paid for their train tickets or plane tickets. They are accompanied to the bank, they open the account. And at the end, they have get 1500 to 2000 euros. And that’s it basically.
Jean-Claude Franck As the prosecutor’s office confirmed to us, that’s what the people who have been arrested so far in the Caritas case are being charged with, being money mules. We should also add that they are innocent until proven guilty.
Pia Oppel You can also see from Guy Grandgirard’s investigations that the alledged money mules provided their services for more than just the multi-million-euro Caritas fraud.
Léonardo Kahn Right, because, as I understand it, the companies and the accounts which were opened by the alleged money mules have also been used for other frauds. But what did you make of it when you came across this information?
Pia Oppel For me, it’s a pretty clear indicator that the Caritas fraud, at least in this respect, that is, in terms of the flows of cash, that it’s a pretty standard fraud that worked exactly the same as thousands of other cases.
Jean-Claude Franck And that the criminal network who is implicated most likely hasn’t just defrauded Caritas and so it was able to draw on a fairly sophisticated machinery to make the money disappear from Spain.
Pia Oppel That also indicates that it is quite likely this fraud wasn’t just cooked up by a few amateurs. Which is also exactly what the prosecutor’s office has officially communicated, that it looks like a case of organised crime.
Léonardo Kahn Did you ever get an explanation as to why exactly the accounts were opened in Spain?
Jean-Claude Franck No, but it’s no coincidence that money that is stolen in one EU country, Luxembourg in the case of Caritas, goes to an account in another EU country first. It seems it often works that way.
Léonardo Kahn And what happens to it after that, as in, when it leaves Spain?
Pia Oppel So I spoke about that to someone whose job is to track down money that criminal networks attempt to launder.
Max Braun Max Braun, I’m the Director of the FIU.
Pia Oppel The Financial Intelligence Unit has a number of different functions. One of those is that it can step in as a rapid taskforce whenever an investigation is ongoing into criminal networks that are attempting to launder large sums of money.
Max Braun When a transfer is sent abroad from Luxembourg, we can ask a foreign FIU: what’s happened on this account? As in, where has the money gone? And if there’s still money on the account, can you please freeze it?
After that, of course, it’s down to law enforcement agencies to go and seize the funds and so on, as necessary, or even to confiscate it.
Pia Oppel One problem is that, usually, the money doesn’t stay in the account for long.
Max Braun What we tend to say these days is that if you don’t react within the first 24 hours, then the chances of getting the money declines substantially.
Pia Oppel We mentioned this in relation to the Caritas case in previous episodes. So far, they haven’t managed to recover any substantial amounts.
Jean-Claude Franck Because what usually happens is the money is spread across multiple other accounts around the world. Sometimes it’s converted into cryptocurrencies. Or it’s just used to buy real goods, for example in China, which are then sold back to the EU, thereby laundering the funds.
Max Braun The laundering networks are absolutely what add complexity. Put simply, what we’re seeing these days is that the money always passes through sophisticated networks. And then, of course, criminals will avail themselves of any services they can to get their money from A to B.
Pia Oppel Not every stage of a fraud is handled by a criminal network itself, they also utilise services offered by other criminals. Let’s say someone has devised and set up a CEO fraud, they’re targeting a company. Pulling that off requires a certain level of expertise in how to manipulate your victims so that they are actually willing to transfer money to an unknown account.
Max Braun There are people who specialise in inventing backstories, in devising CEO frauds, but who aren’t necessarily expert hackers.
This is where the whole issue of ‘Crime as a Service’ comes in. Unfortunately, it’s relatively easy to find people to do the hacking part for you.
Jean-Claude Franck The hacking allows you to gather insider information from a business. Which you need if you want to pretend to be a manager and manipulate an employee into wiring you money.
Max Braun That gives you additional information for setting up your fraud. Then you realise you’re not necessarily an expert in money-laundering. And unfortunately there are also people who offer this ‘Crime as a Service’, and who launder your money. And there are networks, yes, that are used for a long list of frauds, a long list of illegal activities.
Jean-Claude Franck It’s possible this is what happened in the case of the Caritas affair. As in, middlemen recruited money mules who then provided their IBAN numbers to third parties so that stolen money could transit through their accounts.
Léonardo Kahn Which would explain why you were able to find links between the multi-million-euro fraud at Caritas and multiple other smaller cases of fraud at a consumer protection organisation in Lorraine?
Jean-Claude Franck Yes, exactly, as I said, everything here points to this fraud being part of an organised criminal ecosystem.
Pia Oppel So one question now is, will they get the money back? That always matters to the victims, obviously. But the other is: will anyone ever find out who is behind all of this? Because the scammers are definitely not doing all this under their real identities.
Max Braun So, you always have to assume that the first accounts to be identified don’t belong to the mastermind, they usually belong to what we call money mules.
Jean-Claude Franck Which is exactly what we already found out in Nancy, how money mules work. So, next step.
Max Braun And it’s absolutely correct to say that there are accounts that are used for every type of cash flow imaginable. And so the challenge after that is to establish which of the funds, which may or may not be left in the account, belong to who.
Jean-Claude Franck We also saw that in our research into the Caritas case. You can have money transiting through these accounts from all sorts of different frauds. Because of that, it’s not always that easy to identify which of the funds still in the account belong to who, once the authorities have frozen them. So, let’s go one step further because the question was...
Pia Oppel Will anyone ever get their hands on the mastermind? As in, is that even possible nowadays?
Max Braun It would be shame for me to tell you, No. From my perspective, of course it’s possible that we’ll identify them, but you have to be very patient.
Pia Oppel Have you ever seen that happening?
Max Braun Yes.
Pia Oppel More than once?
Max Braun Yes, I mean, we’ve already worked on a number of cases with our colleagues abroad where people were eventually identified, where we could say, this is the person behind it all.
Pia Oppel Max Braun is unable to comment on specific investigations. And certainly not on ones that are still on-going. So we spoke about the Caritas affair indirectly, discussing CEO fraud in more general terms.
Pia Oppel So, if you’re able to tell me, what about the fact that Caritas lost €61 million, does that seem unusual based on what you’ve seen previously? Is that a particularly large amount that they’ve got their hands on or have you seen cases of this magnitude before?
Max Braun Well, the amount in the Caritas case, it’s certainly a large amount.
Pia Oppel OK, and the other question, perhaps I’m pushing my luck a bit here, but the fact that it goes on for so long, have you seen that in other cases too?
Max Braun CEO fraud tends to be a relatively short-lived affair. But there have also been cases that went on for longer.
Pia Oppel And that’s what Max Braun was willing to say when I asked my general questions about CEO fraud which were clearly about Caritas.
Léonardo Kahn You’ve led us down two quite different avenues in this episode. You’ve found out that the CFO knew exactly what CEO fraud looked like. And that during the fraud, she violated her own anti-money laundering rules. At which point you wonder, can she really have fallen for it? But then we’ve seen that this fraud has clear links to a whole criminal ecosystem. Specifically because the alleged money mules don’t only figure in this fraud. The question now is, how do these two things fit together?
Jean-Claude Franck We still don’t know, unfortunately, even after all our digging. As in, how can it be that the CFO became entangled in a fraud that is the work of a criminal network?
Pia Oppel The criminal investigation hasn’t managed to establish any connections yet either. So for now, we have to take the hypothesis that she fell for the fraud seriously. She is also innocent until proven guilty, it’s important to emphasise.
Jean-Claude Franck We spent a lot of time during our investigation discussing exactly the question you’re asking. Especially in terms of all the possible explanations there could be for the CFO’s behaviour.
Pia Oppel We made the decision not to speculate. And to instead use our investigation to highlight inconsistencies in the story. Or gaps, as the case may be.
Jean-Claude Franck It’s also important to bear in mind that, regardless of who is behind this fraud, they should never have been allowed to steal such huge sums of money. The banks, the auditor, the finance team, the management committee, the board of directors... there are so many people who should have spotted that something was amiss.
Pia Oppel The damage is enormous, and for so many of the people we spoke to during our investigation, this isn’t just a story of fraud. Lots of these people are struggling to this day to come to terms with the consequences of the entire affair.
Jean-Claude Franck There’s still hope that it won’t take an eternity for the case to be heard in court. The countless victims of this scandal deserve answers.
Pacoto David Langoya Today you go to the villages, where Caritas Luxembourg has been operating for years. And you hear whispers. People are asking when is Caritas coming back?
Léonardo Kahn You’ve been listening to The Caritas Affair, our second series of Scene Change. Join us in the autumn for another complete change of scene, as we delve into the working conditions of the people who deliver your takeaways. And who knows, perhaps we’ll come back to the Caritas affair when there are important new developments in the case?
Jean-Claude Franck Certainly sounds like a plan!
Léonardo Kahn Either way, thank you, Pia and Jean-Claude, for your research!
Pia Oppel Pleasure, Leo.
Léonardo Kahn To make sure you never miss a thing, subscribe to Scene Change wherever you get your podcasts. And why not check out our first series of Scene Change, the story a failed counter-terrorism investigation and its impact on two young Luxembourg-born women.
Scene Change is produced by Pia Oppel, Charlotte Bruneau, Tessy Troes and me, Léonardo Kahn. With additional helo by Jean-Claude Franck, Yves Stephany, Semir Demic, Jo Diseviscourt, Anke Meiser, Ana Angel and Chris Zeien.
Sound and mixing: Sam Erpelding and Ingo Dumlich. And as always, we’d love to hear your feedback and ideas for future series! Drop us a line at: doku@100komma7.lu.
Translation: Rob Myatt and Pia Oppel.
