On 7 February 2024, the Chief Financial Officer of Caritas Luxembourg receives an e-mail from marc.crochet55(at)gmail.com. Claiming to be the organisation’s CEO, "Marc" urgently requests her help with a confidential financial transaction. Her reply? A swift and unquestioning: "Ok, well received". On 9 February, CFO begins transferring large sums of money to Spain. In episode 1 of this 8-part-podcast series, journalists Pia Oppel and Jean-Claude Franck delve into the early stages of the fraud. The episode raises a key question: Did the CFO truly believe she acted on the instructions of her boss?
Listen to Episode 1 with English subtitles in the video below, or read the full transcript.
Léonardo Kahn Wednesday, 7 February 2024, 4:48 p.m. - the Chief Financial Officer of Caritas receives an e-mail.
MC55 Hello, I am currently handling a major financial transaction. This matter must remain strictly confidential until the official announcement, which will take place on Wednesday, February 21. It is important not to make any reference to this matter verbally, or even over the phone, at this time. Has Maître Buchet of the Melot & Buchet firm called? Sincerely, Marc Crochet
Léonardo Kahn Marc Crochet is the CEO of Caritas. Only this e-mail isn’t from his work address, it is from marc.crochet55@gmail.com. The CFO replies 13 minutes later. Thus begins the largest case of financial fraud to ever hit the Luxembourg social sector.
CFO Hello Marc, OK, got it. He’s on the phone with me. I'm waiting for your instructions.
Léonardo Kahn Two days after the first e-mail, Caritas makes a wire transfer to a bank account in Spain. But that’s just the start. Within five months, a total of €61 million will vanish. An act of fraud that has left Caritas a mere shell of its former self.
Sophie Morang HUT, that is the name of the new nonprofit set to take over Caritas’ national operations.
Djuna Bernard A completely new, completely unknown and completely neutral organisation.
Marc Baum It’s meant the end of the road for vital international projects.
Xavier Bettel It’s an absolute disgrace, really, taking money away from the poorest. Pardon my language, but it makes you sick.
Sophie Morang Word of the Year 2024 is CEO fraud.
Carole Reckinger Caritas has always tried to be a voice for those who have none. I can’t see who’s going to replace them, or even who could.
Léonardo Kahn How was such large-scale fraud even possible? And was the collapse of Caritas inevitable? My name is Léonardo Kahn and this is Scene Change, the radio 100.7 investigative podcast.
Our second series of Scene Change is called The Caritas Affair. Across eight episodes, we will chart the timeline of a scandal where everything that could have gone wrong, did.
Join us as we take a deep-dive into the investigation to get an idea of what exactly happened. And to see if maybe things could have turned out differently.
Episode 1: The Chief Financial Officer.
Jean-Claude Franck, Pia Oppel, you’ve been digging into the case. It was radio 100.7 that brought the fraud at Caritas to the public’s attention last year. What can you tell us about how you got a hold of this information?
Jean-Claude Franck For us, it all started on 18 July, that’s the first time I got wind of the fraud. I was tipped off about a big sum of money going missing from an NGO. I was told it was going to be a major scandal – so I put everything else on hold and got down to work to find out what had happened.
The day after, on 19 July, I had enough pieces of the puzzle to go public with the full story.
[Panorama jingle]
Sophie Schroeder According to information obtained by radio 100.7, Caritas has fallen victim to a scam which threatens to jeopardise the very existence of the charity.
Jean-Claude Franck At that point, Pia starts bombarding me with questions.
Pia Oppel Because I was on my way to the beach in Belgium. And my reaction was probably the same as everyone else’s, I couldn’t really believe all the things they were saying.
Jean-Claude Franck So during those first few days of research, I was keeping Pia looped in on everything I was digging up.
[Mobile phone pings]
Jean-Claude Franck Have found out the CFO got in touch with Caritas the Friday after we went public. Said she had only been following instructions.[Mobile phone pings]
Jean-Claude Franck So, one potential scenario for all the back and forth that’s involved – there’s this type of fraud called CEO fraud.
[Mobile phone pings]
Jean-Claude Franck Spoke with a contact who knows a thing or two about financial crime. Asked him if you could really con a CFO like that, he said it was unlikely.
[Mobile phone pings]
Jean-Claude Franck Have to say, after a few days of digging, it really isn’t easy establishing a clear picture of what’s happened here.
Léonardo Kahn Now here we are, nine months later: has the mystery finally been solved? Do we know who’s behind the fraud?
Jean-Claude Franck No, the criminal investigation isn’t finished yet. It could still be years before we see anyone on trial.
Pia Oppel But it does seem as if the investigation has made good headway. The first arrests were made back in January.
[Panorama jingle]
Pierre Reyland Good evening, new developments in the Caritas scandal. Eight individuals have been taken into custody as part of police raids carried out in Bulgaria, France and the UK.
Pia Oppel There’s a lot of evidence to suggest that a criminal organisation is responsible for the Caritas fraud. There’s been talk of a Bulgarian network potentially being involved.
Jean-Claude Franck The money that was stolen was transferred from Spain to hundreds of bank accounts in other countries. Which is exactly what makes this sort of investigation so time-consuming, because investigators have to comb through all of these transactions.
Léonardo Kahn And the CFO, she’s been had by this criminal network, she’s been a victim of CEO fraud?
Pia Oppel That’s what she’s told the investigating judge, yes. She supposedly received instructions from a person pretending to be her boss, which is why she made the transfers. Why she didn’t question those instructions, we don’t know. We’ve spoken with her lawyer at length regarding the case, but he didn’t want to comment on that particular point.
Jean-Claude Franck Legally speaking, she is indicted in July, as soon as the fraud comes to light. The reason she is also a person of interest is that she was personally involved in wiring the €61 million to Spain. So far, though, it seems like the investigation hasn’t found any evidence that she was an accomplice or that she herself benefited from the fraud in any way.
Pia Oppel It’s also important to note here that, either way, she’s innocent until proven guilty. And that we have chosen not to name her because she wasn’t a public figure prior to this incident.
Léonardo Kahn The fraud begins in February: how did you go about finding out what happened from that point onwards?
Jean-Claude Franck We spoke to a lot of people who are familiar with the internal workings at Caritas. People who have been following the investigation. And we went through mountains of internal documents, including e-mails between the CFO and Marc Crochet 55 – or MC55 for short. That’s what we’re calling the person or persons pretending to be the CEO of Caritas in these e-mails, just to keep things simple.
Léonardo Kahn The e-mails that were sent from marc.crochet55@gmail.com. Let’s just go back to the beginning again for a second. What exactly happened after that very first e-mail exchange on 7 February 2024?
Jean-Claude Franck So, yeah, it all starts with that first e-mail at 4:48 p.m..
MC55 Hello, I am currently handling a major financial transaction. This matter must remain strictly confidential.
Jean-Claude Franck The CFO writes back that she’s on the phone with the lawyer, someone neither she nor Caritas had anything to do with prior to this.
CFO Hello Marc, OK, got it. He’s on the phone with me. I'm waiting for your instructions.
Pia Oppel And then what happens is that MC55 responds to the CFO’s message six minutes later, as in, it’s a reply, not a new e-mail thread. But he doesn’t address the CFO’s confirmation or her request for instructions.
Jean-Claude Franck Instead, the CFO is again given the same brief, only this time with slightly different information and instructions.
MC55 I am currently handling a confidential financial transaction involving the acquisition of a facility. I have appointed Maître Buchet Maxime to handle this matter. Please contact him by e-mail to make the necessary payments.
Pia Oppel So now it’s no longer just about a financial transaction, it’s about the purchase of a facility. It’s still unclear what exactly MC55 means by that.
Jean-Claude Franck And the CFO receives these new instructions, even though she has already confirmed that she is in contact with Maxime Buchet.
Léonardo Kahn So the CFO is given this brief twice, with slightly different wording each time. First she’s told to get in touch with the lawyer by phone, only to be told the second time to e-mail him. How does she react to that?
Jean-Claude Franck She doesn’t respond to the second e-mail with these new instructions. But she does send MC55 another message in the evening of 7 February, attaching a large number of documents – bank statements from Caritas’ various different accounts.
Pia Oppel Which, it’s worth noting, the CEO also has himself direct access to.
Léonardo Kahn Regardless, the CFO e-mails the information over to MC55: how much money is in the accounts at this point?
Jean-Claude Franck There are around 40 accounts, belonging to Fondatioun Caritas, ASBL Caritas Accueil et Solidarité, Fondation Cecile Ginter, and Spëndchen ASBL. These are all entities, for which the CFO assures compliance. And there’s around €30 million in them altogether.
Léonardo Kahn Which is a huge amount of money for a charitable organisation.
Jean-Claude Franck It’s not exactly small change, no. But you have to bear in mind the size of the organisation. The Foundation and CAS, that is, Caritas Accueil et Solidarité, had around 500 people working for them in total. They were spending around €3 million every month on payroll alone. So there’s a lot of money being moved around.
Pia Oppel And it’s not as if all of it belonged to Caritas either. We were told that roughly half of that was effectively kept as reserves.
Léonardo Kahn Caritas makes the first fraudulent transfer two days later, on 9 February. What instructions is the CFO given exactly, when she’s told to make the transfer?
Jean-Claude Franck MC55 sends her a Spanish account number.
MC55 Hello, Here are the bank details so that you can make the payment of €285.700.
Pia Oppel The transfer is made the same day. The recipient specified is Caritas Internationalis, i.e. the governing body of the global Caritas network.
Léonardo Kahn But we now know that that account didn’t belong to Caritas Internationalis at all.
Jean-Claude Franck Indeed, the payee that was entered is not the real account holder. And it’s not exactly like the payment details were kept secret during this whole process. There’s no way the CFO wasn’t aware.
Pia Oppel By 12 March, the CFO has made 18 of these transfers from a Caritas account with BGL BNP Paribas, totalling around €9 million which is supposedly going to Caritas Internationalis. In reality, though, those funds are ending up in one of four different Spanish accounts. From there, the money is transferred again and winds up in the hands of a criminal gang.
Jean-Claude Franck Meanwhile, the CFO wires across even more money, under instruction from MC55, i.e. the person or persons pretending to be her boss.
MC55 It is necessary for Maître Buchet to obtain some names of suppliers who can be used to make payments.
Jean-Claude Franck In other words: we need the names of partners who usually work with Caritas so that we can forge invoices.
Léonardo Kahn And how does the CFO react to that request?
Pia Oppel She gets a genuine invoice which Caritas actually received from a partner organisation in Turkey called ASAM. ASAM helps victims of the earthquake that struck Turkey a few years ago. And the CFO takes a pen and writes on this document, from a real invoice from ASAM, instructions for all the bits that need changing. Then she scans the document. As in, the original invoice with her handwritten suggestions for changes.
Jean-Claude Franck And then this message comes through from MC55.
MC55 Attached you will find the invoice for the next payments.
Pia Oppel But something appears to be wrong with the invoice, because the CFO replies:
CFO It’s not the right one, Marc.
MC55 Yet, this is what I received from Maître Buchet.
Jean-Claude Franck Ten minutes later, it seems the CFO has been in touch with the lawyer.
CFO He makes a new one.
Jean-Claude Franck Half an hour after that, MC55 sends over a new invoice.
MC55 Attached is the document.
Léonardo Kahn A real back and forth! Let me try and summarise what I’ve understood so far: the CFO is helping to forge an invoice. It appears to be the lawyer who’s doing the forgery. And then giving it to MC55 to be passed on to the CFO. Have I understood correctly?
Pia Oppel Yes, that’s my understanding of what happened. My only question is, why doesn’t Buchet just send the invoice to the CFO himself? If he’s looking after the documents and she’s telling him something’s off with the invoice – why the complicated set-up where everything is done exclusively via e-mail with MC55, but also simultaneously over the phone with Buchet?
Léonardo Kahn Did you ever get an answer to your question?
Jean-Claude Franck We might have identified a practical reason as to why there were no e-mails from the lawyer, Buchet.
Léonardo Kahn Which is?
Jean-Claude Franck Well, it’s possible that the e-mail address for the lawyer which MC55 provided in his very first e-mail didn’t actually work.
Léonardo Kahn Why do you say that? Did you try it?
Jean-Claude Franck Yep, we tried e-mailing it and it didn’t work. And because, as far as we were able to ascertain, the CFO does in fact send an e-mail to that address on one occasion. Her e-mail also bounces back.
Léonardo Kahn Why is that e-mail address even mentioned in the first place then?
Jean-Claude Franck That left us scratching our heads too. Perhaps the reason for giving the address was to make the existence of the lawyer seem more credible. Because there is in fact a corporate lawyer in Paris called Maxime Buchet, and his e-mail address is just one letter different.
Pia Oppel The entire set-up is also very typical of CEO fraud. There’s usually an e-mail exchange and alongside that spoken communication, over the phone, for example. And it’s mainly those conversations that are meant to help weave a narrative for the victim that lends credibility to everything they’re being asked to do – usually transferring money to an unknown account.
Léonardo Kahn So you’re saying there was in fact a Maxime Buchet on the phone?
Pia Oppel A person pretending to be Maxime Buchet, yes. And it’s worth noting here that we don’t know what this person told the CFO. Meaning we don’t know whether these conversations might explain her behaviour better than the e-mails, which throw up more than a few questions.
Jean-Claude Franck That’s where we hit a wall in our investigation. And it’s something to bear in mind with everything we’re talking about here: we’re missing a key piece of the puzzle. In cases of CEO fraud, people really do do the craziest things, because they’re wrapped up in a story that seems credible to them in the moment.
Pia Oppel Scammers will usually collect information on their victims first, in order to boost their chances of success. They’ll use all sorts of means. And we know that before the fraud began, the CFO was in contact with a fortune teller online. One theory, therefore, is that this allowed a criminal gang to gather a lot of information that maybe helped them ensnare the CFO.
Jean-Claude Franck It’s worth adding, though, that if the CFO has indeed fallen for the scam, she doesn’t appear to have made much of an effort to question the things she was being told.
Léonardo Kahn Which is exactly the part I’m struggling to understand, logically, because surely doubt would have started to creep in when her e-mail to Maxime Buchet bounced back, if not sooner?
Jean-Claude Franck Exactly, plus there’s a telephone number for the real Maxime Buchet online. A simple phone call would have been enough to verify the identity of the person she was talking to.
Maxime Buchet My name is Maxime Buchet. I have been a lawyer at the Paris Bar for about twenty years now. I run a firm of about ten lawyers, and we do business and tax law.
Pia Oppel I contacted the real Maxime Buchet last autumn. By that point, the criminal police in Luxembourg had already been in touch with him.
Maxime Buchet I think it was around August 20. I was put in contact with the police officer in charge of the case in Luxembourg who questioned me in the context of this case.
Since it appeared that my name had been used, but the email that had been used did not correspond to my email. And the telephone number that was used did not correspond to my telephone number.
Imagine a call in August, and you're told, "Your name appears in a criminal investigation.” We're talking about several million euros, several tens of millions of euros, when, of course, you have nothing to do with this case. You're extremely shocked. And I really don’t want my professional reputation to be tarnished by this, so I filed a complaint.
Léonardo Kahn The real Maxime Buchet says he’s filed a complaint because he’s been the victim of identity fraud. So what role does the fake Maxime Buchet play in the scam?
Jean-Claude Franck It looks like the fake Maxime Buchet always spoke to the CFO. MC55 mentions the lawyer regularly in their e-mails to the CFO. The way the e-mails are written, it seems as if the person pretending to be Maxime Buchet has a good rapport with the CFO.
MC55 You have received a lot of praise from Maître Buchet, who seems delighted to be working with you.
Jean-Claude Franck MC55 sends this e-mail on 19 February. And the CFO replies.
CFO Hello Marc, Yes, he appreciates my work and values the importance of good support service, which is a bit of a change from the usual. -)-)
Pia Oppel This message ends with a pair of smileys. The implication that she doesn’t normally get much praise at work will come up again in this story.
Léonardo Kahn So, we now know that this fraud involves a fake Marc Crochet – who only ever writes e-mails. Then there’s a fake lawyer, Maxime Buchet – who only ever makes verbal contact. We don’t know who is behind these false identities. But they’re the ones giving the instructions. It’s also clear, though, that this scam would never have succeeded without the CFO. What do we know about her?
Pia Oppel I mean, for the longest time we weren’t sure how much we should reveal about her. CEO fraud can have a massive destabilising impact on victims. We have to tread carefully. And we have to take seriously the hypothesis that she was tricked.
Jean-Claude Franck Equally, though, you have to remember that the position of CFO at Caritas came with a lot of responsibility – her job wasn’t just to do whatever other people told her, she was also supposed to represent the organisation’s interests. So even if your boss is asking you to do something illegal, that’s hardly a good excuse.
Pia Oppel You can’t tell the story of this fraud without the CFO. And at some point, the events we’re talking about here are going to be scrutinised by the courts as well.
Jean-Claude Franck That’s why we decided to explore the CFO’s character. And to quote her work e-mail exchanges.
Léonardo Kahn I see, so what can you tell us about the CFO then?
Jean-Claude Franck She’s 51, married with two kids. She’s Belgian and studied commercial engineering at the University of Liège – majoring in finance, according to her LinkedIn.
Pia Oppel Before joining Caritas, she spent 15 years working for Dupont de Nemours – a US chemical company that has an office in Luxembourg – and then she worked at LIST, the Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, for two and a half years before moving to Caritas in 2019.
To get a better idea of who the CFO is, I spoke to an old colleague of hers who had left Caritas by the time the fraud occurred and who lots of people told me had a good rapport with the CFO.
Martine Leseigne My name is Martine Leseigne and for four years, the last four years of my career, I was the Director of Human Resources at Caritas.
Pia Oppel Martine Leseigne suggested we meet at the bar in the Hôtel Le Royal.
Martine Leseigne Tea-time at the Royal. Yes, for me, it's a bit like my Stammcafé. I'll have a cappuccino, sir, please.
Pia Oppel It’s early afternoon, we are virtually the only customers. We are sat in a large vaulted room beneath shimmering purple lights that hang from the ceiling like icicles.
Martine Leseigne worked for a bank for many years before joining Caritas in 2019 as the new Head of HR.
Martine Leseigne I discovered a world that is more on the Boy Scout side. Where everyone is doing their best. We only see the interest of people who are in need, whether it’s migrants, homeless people or whoever. And the administrative side is something, that collides with the rest, you know.
Pia Oppel The CFO started at Caritas virtually the same day as Martine Leseigne.
Martine Leseigne We both came from private companies, so we had a way of working and thinking that was relatively identical.
Pia Oppel From day one, there were tensions between the CFO and her colleagues.
Martine Leseigne The human connection did not go very well with the employees. I think there was a misapprehension. Or perhaps a refusal by some old barons to welcome the changes she wanted to make or the things she wanted to put in place. For any payment, she wanted supporting documents, etc. I mean she had a very rigorous approach.
Léonardo Kahn So Martine Leseigne saw the CFO as someone who didn’t get along particularly well with her colleagues, but who always kept a close eye on the budget.
Pia Oppel Exactly, and multiple other sources confirmed that characterisation as well. As in, the fact that there was often tension with the CFO, in part because of how she behaved towards her colleagues.
Jean-Claude Franck And the fact that she always queried every expense. People told us that there would be discussions over every pen, every pot plant that someone wanted to buy, things like that.
Pia Oppel Which is not to say that everyone was of the opinion that the CFO had a good handle on her job and the budget at Caritas. Quite the opposite, finance had been a major point of contention at Caritas in recent years. In particular because no-one had accurate figures which they could use for budget planning.
Jean-Claude Franck There was even an internal audit that confirmed that. The fact that the finance department was not functioning properly and that tensions were simmering. But the underlying causes that the audit identified are pretty varied and it wasn’t all down to the CFO.
Pia Oppel In other words, there was plenty of stress around the office. And things were no different in the spring of 2024. Martine Leseigne had already retired by that point, but she was still in touch with the CFO.
Pia Oppel So in March 2024 you met her here at the Royal Hotel, where we are now.
Martine Leseigne Yes, that was our last lunch.
I was surprised because she had patches a bit like that on her face. And that worried me, and I thought, "What's going on?" And then she told me no, that it just happened, that it was probably signs of stress, etc. We also talked about work, but not so much in the end. I asked her how things were going, and when we talked about the CEO, she told me he's still the same, she says he's a draft, you don't see him. He always has a thousand and one things to do. Communication with him is complicated.
Pia Oppel So, Martine Leseigne meets up with the CFO in March 2024, at which point the fraud has been going on for a month. And she tells Martine Leseigne that communication with the CEO, March Crochet, is far from good.
Jean-Claude Franck There was genuine tension between the CFO and her boss, we’ll come back to that later when we look in more detail at the working relationships on the management team – and how come none of them spotted the fraud.
Léonardo Kahn So do you have a clearer idea now of what happened? As in, whether or not the CFO could have been a victim of CEO fraud?
Pia Oppel No, it’s still murky. In fact, something we kept hearing from people, including Martine Leseigne, was that no-one understands why the CFO acted the way she did. They all feel like the whole story is chock full of inconsistencies. That’s our impression too.
Jean-Claude Franck Yes, no matter which theory you subscribe to: that she was the victim of CEO fraud for five whole months or that she was an accomplice. So we need to keep searching for explanations.
Léonardo Kahn Let’s get back to what we do know: 125 fraudulent transfers are made to Spain. Of those, 19 are made to Spain under the pretext that they are for Caritas Internationalis. And the others did all go to Spain with forged invoices, under the pretext that they were for ASAM?
Jean-Claude Franck Yes. The first invoice, which looks as if it’s going to be paid to ASAM, the partner organisation in Turkey, is paid on 14 February for nearly €300,000.
Pia Oppel The next transfer is on 15 February. From then on, each transfer is always for just under €500,000. And the tempo slowly picks up: at one point in March, a full twelve transfers are made in the space of three days.
Jean-Claude Franck But then suddenly, after 9 April, it all grinds to a halt. And nothing happens for an entire month.
Léonardo Kahn The transfers stop? Why?
Jean-Claude Franck It seems the money had run out. Still, between 9 February and 9 April, so exactly two months, around €31 million was wired to Spain.
Pia Oppel This is where the fraud appears to come to an end.
MC55 Hello, you will find the invoices for the final payments attached. Thank you for your professionalism. Sincerely, Marc Crochet
Jean-Claude Franck That’s from an e-mail which MC55 sends on 8 April: the invoices for the final payments.
Léonardo Kahn Right, but the fraud was actually far from over by April, in fact it carried on for another three months. So how do you explain these statements?
Pia Oppel We don’t know exactly. What we do know is this: this supposedly secret project was allegedly about the purchase of a “facility”. And it sounds like what they actually meant is a company, because the entire operation is supposed to be about making a profit. And there are repeated mentions of a public announcement.
Jean-Claude Franck That announcement was supposed to have been made on 21 February. At least according to the very first e-mail from MC55. But it keeps getting pushed back again and again, always under very flimsy pretences. At the end of March, for example.
MC55 Hello, Maître Buchet is at a loss as to how to handle tomorrow's announcement. He's in a terrible situation, extremely stressed... Do you mind if we make the announcement on Thursday?
Jean-Claude Franck The CFO appears to be understanding.
CFO Hello Marc, yes, that’s what I understood... Listen, we're not a day away anymore and if it can allow everyone to be more relaxed and finish this on a good note, I'm okay with Thursday. Given all the work that has been done, it would be a shame to stress about the end of the case.
Jean-Claude Franck She’s also willing to move her other deadlines at work if necessary.
CFO I can postpone all or part of it, but I would still like to know how this announcement will go, because I am still waiting for something that is called "desired." -)-)-)
Jean-Claude Franck Once again, the new date for the announcement falls through. Meanwhile, by 8 April MC55 is already talking about final payments and yet a full ten days after that, the project is still up in the air.
MC55 I just spoke with Maître Buchet, he'll be here around 4:30 p.m. I have the impression that he's starting to get attached to you, he's stressed about the delay more for you than for the case.
Pia Oppel This is how things stand by mid-April: €31 million has been stolen, yet still no-one has noticed. For things to stay that way, the CFO has to make sure that running costs can be covered somehow. Payroll and so on.
MC55 It's imperative that you manage the time it takes to avoid jeopardizing the entire case. If you need to apply for another line of credit from the bank, don't hesitate.
Léonardo Kahn So by April, half of the money has gone. The CFO goes to the banks to borrow money so that the fraud can continue. How does that happen?
Pia Oppel Join us next time to find out.
Léonardo Kahn Thank you Pia, thank you Jean-Claude.
Jean-Claude Franck Pleasure.
Pia Oppel Thank you, Leo.
Léonardo Kahn You’ve been listening to Scene Change, the 100.7 investigative podcast. Scene Change is produced by Pia Oppel, Charlotte Bruneau, Tessy Troes and me, Léonardo Kahn.
With additional help by Jean-Claude Franck, Yves Stephany, Semir Demic, Chris Zeien, Ana Angel and Jo Diseviscourt.
Thank you to Marie Trussart and Charlotte Bruneau for providing the voices of the CFO and MC55.
Sound and mixing: Sam Erpelding and Ingo Dumlich.
To make sure you never miss an episode, subscribe to Scene Change wherever you get your podcasts. And if you have any questions or want to give us feedback, drop us an e-mail at doku@100komma7.lu.
Translation: Rob Myatt and Pia Oppel.
